To:
Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
cc:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Jerry Scharf <scharf@vix.com>
Date:
Thu, 08 Feb 2001 07:39:39 -0800
In-reply-to:
Your message of "Thu, 08 Feb 2001 14:27:29 +0700." <2072.981617249@brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior
> You mean if I send in hundreds of delegation requests (for domains I > administer I mean, not hijacking or similar) naming your servers as > authoritative for the zones (and perhaps giving bogus glue records > for your servers as well), you're going to be quite content with that > when the registry doesn't bother to check, and simply lists the data > that was sent to them. > > Or, if they do check, should then then listen to me when I claim > "I know what I am doing, I have been administering the DNS longer > than you have, put in the records I want, they will do what I think > is correct" ? > That in an unbeleivabe distortion of the original post. You are describing a clueless move, and I agree with making sure that servers listed are not lame. We are talking here about subtle interpretations of the DNS specifications and I think in those cases we do need to have some latitude to let people have rope. jerry