[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
Cc: dnsop@cafax.se
From: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 00:07:38 +1100
In-reply-to: Your message of "06 Feb 2001 00:09:12 -0000." <20010206000912.28897.qmail@cr.yp.to>
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior


	Dan,
	      I don't always agree with you but I will on this one.

	Mark

> Servers (as opposed to caches) should not have root information unless
> they are root servers. Caches will never ask for the information; and
> there's a cost to copying the information and worrying about keeping it
> up to date. These are not new observations.
> 
> Unfortunately, the .fr administrators won't delegate to servers that
> don't have the current root NS records and corresponding A records.
> 
> This is not an isolated example. They also insist on TCP service even if
> you don't have any big records, and 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa PTR records,
> and various other server behaviors that are not relevant to DNS service.
> 
> Where does this disease come from? Even if the .fr administrators are
> confused about how DNS works, why do they care what other servers do?
> 
> ---Dan
--
Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc.
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com

Home | Date list | Subject list