[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: itojun@iijlab.net, users@ipv6.org, dnsop@cafax.se
From: Marc Blanchet <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 15:17:31 -0500
In-Reply-To: <11642.980698794@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: BIND8/9 interaction with zones with A6

interesting...

you should probably report that to the bind-*@isc.org mailing lists.

Marc.

At/À 01:19 2001-01-29 +0900, itojun@iijlab.net you wrote/vous écriviez:
>         we noticed this recently so i thought i should report it...
>
>         assume that you are using BIND9 as the master server for a zone
>         (like foo.net), and BIND8 as the slave server(s).
>
>         once you put A6 records into database files in master server,
>         slaves become unable to zone-transfer the zone at all.
>         slaves will never be able to transfer zones, so they will have
>         zone database with older serial number (which was fetched in the 
> past)
>         or cannot server the zone (as a slave).
>
>         so, if you wish to use A6 in foo.net, you need to use BIND9 on all
>         masters and slaves.  does anyone have any workaround for this?
>
>         i guess DNAME and bit string label could present the same effect.
>
>itojun
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>The IPv6 Users Mailing List
>Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to majordomo@ipv6.org


Marc Blanchet
Viagénie inc.
tel: 418-656-9254
http://www.viagenie.qc.ca

----------------------------------------------------------
Normos (http://www.normos.org): Internet standards portal:
IETF RFC, drafts, IANA, W3C, ATMForum, ISO, ... all in one place.


Home | Date list | Subject list