To:
perry@wasabisystems.com (Perry E. Metzger)
Cc:
moore@cs.utk.edu (Keith Moore), randy@psg.com (Randy Bush), he@runit.no (Havard Eidnes), seamus@bit-net.com, users@ipv6.org, dnsop@cafax.se, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
From:
Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
Date:
Sun, 21 Jan 2001 10:04:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
<87vgra8riw.fsf@snark.piermont.com> from "Perry E. Metzger" at Jan 20, 2001 05:08:39 AM
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns
% It has occurred to me for some time that we should be willing to % supply host routes for the root servers in the default free % zone. We're only talking about a tiny number of servers, and it is the % only service for which this is necessary. Yes, it would end up adding % a dozen extra routes to the tables, but I think that in general it is % probably the right way to go. % % Anyone else have thoughts on that notion? % % Perry % THe last time it was seriously raised was at the Joint IETF/ISOC mtg in Montreal. The failure modes are pretty spectactular, at least until DNSsec is deployed and applications can verify the accuracy of the data received from a root server. -- --bill