To:
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@wasabisystems.com>
Cc:
Havard Eidnes <he@runit.no>, seamus@bit-net.com, users@ipv6.org, dnsop@cafax.se, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
From:
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date:
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:36:48 -0800
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: IPv6 dns
> I've asked Randy explicitly if he felt that there was an issue here, > and the only issue he can articulate is a worry about cache > contamination, not a worry about hosts going ga-ga when they get > exposed to quad-A or A6. likely only because of lack of clue about this aspect of the problem. other then udp size problems, i am not sure what other aspects of aaaa and a6 sould worry me. but bill seemed worried. and if bill is even the tensiest concerned, then i would probably be terrified if i understood the issue. :-) sorry to be so boring here. but it is because we don't clearly and crisply understand what needs to be tested, that we do not understand what a test plan would be, and thus we can not judge any dangers it might pose so we can try to protect against them. randy