To:
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Jim Bound <seamus@bit-net.com>
Cc:
users@ipv6.org, dns op wg <dnsop@cafax.se>, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
From:
"David R. Conrad" <david.conrad@nominum.com>
Date:
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 07:24:11 -0800
In-Reply-To:
<E14ItzF-000FkY-00@rip.psg.com>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: IPv6 dns
Maybe unrelated but has ip6.arpa been delegated yet? Rgds, -drc At 06:54 AM 1/17/2001 -0800, Randy Bush wrote: > > I am trying to get someone to tell me exactly what the problem is with the > > existing DNS servers and why there is any deployment problem. Thus far I > > can find nor get any concrete data that anything is wrong. I have > > outstanding mail to the DNS chair. > > > > Until someone can provide some concrete data we should begin deployment. > > > > There are no DNS police or governments if the owners of the root servers > > will deploy IPv6. And ngtrans has seen no issue. > > > > Clearly A6 records can cause a performance problem at the resolver but > > that should not be news to anyone at this point. > >in san diego, we agreed that > o ngtrans would write up what the v6 community actually needs/wants > o dnsop would then design and write up how to meet that need > o the operational community would then do it > >but, the chairs of ngtrans have specifically told me that they can see no >actual need at the present time. hence, i have not whined at the [dns]ops >community for help. please educate me if i am off the track here. > >randy