[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Bill Manning <bmanning@zed.isi.edu>
CC: Peter Gradwell <peter@gradwell.com>, dnsop@cafax.se
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:54:07 +0859 ()
In-Reply-To: <200012091832.eB9IWMt17670@zed.isi.edu> from Bill Manning at "Dec9, 2000 10:32:21 am"
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Commercial Advantages of Hosting Name Servers

Bill;

> % If a name server is hosted with an ISP, does that give the ISP a commercial
> % advantage in anyway, for example, in marketing, or in negotiating peering
> % agreements, or similar?
> 
> 	Yes, hosting a server does provide a commercial advantage. There
> 	is no way to escape it.
> 
> 	This concern was what drove the placement of the four additional
> 	root servers that were created in 1995.  Many ISPs expressed 
> 	interest in hosting. The principle reason was that it provided
> 	a competative advantage, hence the model that was chosen was to
> 	have one entity, usually a membership or constituency based 
> 	entity operate the node, with physical placement being directed
> 	by short RTTs within a region and good connectivity to the 
> 	other servers for the domain.

Hmmm, if so, ISPs running root servers are motivated to act against
anycast root servers, I'm afraid.

							Masataka Ohta

Home | Date list | Subject list