To:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
"D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
Date:
26 Apr 2000 20:38:49 -0000
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: root server load and dynamic updates.
Eric A. Hall writes: > What would be the ramifications of setting MNAME to a bogus name? Better: A real name pointing to a different host, such as 127.0.0.1. But I still haven't heard any evidence that this will noticeably affect NSI's traffic. Post-hoc-propter-hoc garbage is not evidence. If there's a torrent of dynamic updates, then that'll be obvious from a traffic sample, so why does NSI say that it hasn't figured out the problem? ---Dan