To:
Harald@Alvestrand.no (Harald Tveit Alvestrand)
Cc:
mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp, dee3@torque.pothole.com, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date:
Mon, 6 Dec 99 9:45:33 JST
In-Reply-To:
<4.2.0.58.19991205163112.01c387d0@dokka.maxware.no>; from "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" at Dec 5, 99 4:36 pm
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Last WG call for draft-ietf-dnsop-root-opreq-02.txt.
Harald; > >Yes. Harald could have said just "email", instead of giving false > >impression that unsigned emails are less secure than telephone > >or fax. > If we want the document to require a cryptographically secured non-DNS > channel for verifying the content of a root zone file, and the only one we > can think of at the moment is signed email with preverified keys, we'd > better make sure the document says exactly that. Be consistent. Or, are you saying phone or fax, which you mentioned with signed email, cryptographically secured? Wiesel wording is not effective on me. Masataka Ohta