To:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
Date:
Wed, 5 May 1999 15:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
<199905052134.OAA08534@proteus.equinix.com> from "hardie@equinix.com" at May 05, 1999 02:34:25 PM
Reply-To:
dnsop@cafax.se
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Experiments in multi-placed root servers
> I also believe some of the operational problems seen > in other deployments have been because the software involved was > designed to meet the needs of customers with requirements which > actually differed fairly significantly. We're aiming to do one pretty > specific thing here, which will hopefully reduce the set of potential > problems. We're also not talking about rushing into anything; I see > this as a very staged roll-out, with a *lot* of testing. Testing is a good idea. Do you think that doing this type of testing is reasonable with a live root server? > Achieving redundancy is also only part of what we're aiming > for here. Think of it from the point of view of a non-North American > network user. There is a high concentration of root servers in North > America and the links to reach them may be expensive or high latency > or both. Without moving current roots to new places in the network > topology, how do you serve those users? You move the servers to better places. There is no assurence that any given technology/topology is the end-all for Internet services. > Distributing replicas of the > data to a wide variety of places is one answer, and that distribution > fits the current models better if the replicas are authoritative. As > Randy pointed out during the BOF, replicated distribution can create > its own problems of administration and coordination unless all the > copies are coordinated through a single entity. > That's really the problem space we see; how do you see > the problem and its potential resolution? How do you dismantle this service when it no longer fits Internet topology or technology? Moving a single platform is -much- easier than killing off a replicated system. Current models are just that. Remember that this was a BOF discussing root server ops. Of course root server placement is the perview of IANA and not such an IETF venue. > regards, > Ted Hardie > > > > On Wed, 5 May 1999 bmanning@ISI.EDU wrote: > > > > > > > stratagy since the failure modes are so baroque as to make > > > > debugging/troublshooting such events lifetime employment > > > > for certain classes of engineers. While things are improving, > > > > > > Bill - You could always look at it as a new form > > > of job security :-) > > > > > > Ray > > > > So, you folks hiring :-) > > > > --bill > > > > -- --bill